💡 Why OnlyFans stays off the Apple App Store (and why you should care)

If you’ve ever wondered why OnlyFans doesn’t behave like your average social app—no neat little icon in the App Store, no one-tap subscription via Apple Pay—you’re not alone. The question keeps popping up in creator DMs, Discord channels, and comment threads: is it about safety? fees? image? The short answer is: all of the above, but with a strategic twist.

OnlyFans deliberately keeps a web-first model to avoid the revenue-sharing cut that comes from being inside the Apple/Google app ecosystems. That move affects creator payouts, onboarding friction, moderation workflows, and how the platform invests in safety tools. It also shapes user behavior: discovery lives more in social links and web searches rather than app-store browsing.

In this piece I’ll walk you through the real reasons OnlyFans stays off the App Store, what that means for creators and fans in 2025, and how the platform’s safety investments and policy choices are re-writing the creator-economy playbook. You’ll get data-backed context, recent reporting touchpoints, a neat comparison table, and practical takeaways whether you’re a creator, a marketing pro, or just a curious fan.

📊 Quick comparison: platform distribution & creator economics

🧑‍🎤 Platform💰 Fee / App-store impact🛡️ Safety verification staff📱 App presence📈 Users / Reach
OnlyFansNo App Store cut — keeps payment revenue flow on web1,500No300,000,000
PatreonPlatform fees + payment fees (varies by plan)Yes
Spotify (creator tools)App-store listed apps; subscription splits depend on integrationsYes
Apple App StoreStandard developer cut (commonly ~30% on in-app purchases)N/A (store)

This quick snapshot shows why OnlyFans’ web-first choice matters: the platform keeps payment flows off the App Store, which preserves revenue for creators and the company, and funnels resources into moderation and verification instead. The standout numbers are OnlyFans’ investment into people: roughly 1,500 staff dedicated to verification and moderation, and a reported base of about 4 million creators and 300 million registered users — big scale for a web-led model. Those choices shape discovery (more link-driven), onboarding (more KYC on web), and legal/compliance workflows.

😎 MaTitie SHOW TIME

Hi, I’m MaTitie — the author of this post, a man proudly chasing great deals, guilty pleasures, and maybe a little too much style.
I’ve tested hundreds of VPNs and explored more “blocked” corners of the internet than I should probably admit.
Let’s be real — here’s what matters 👇

Access to platforms like OnlyFans or TikTok in Canada can sometimes be clunky depending on app availability and local payment flows.
If you want speed, privacy, and reliable access — skip the guesswork.

👉 🔐 Try NordVPN now — 30-day risk-free. 💥

It works like a charm in Canada, and you can get a full refund if it’s not for you.
No risks. No drama. Just pure access.

This post contains affiliate links. If you buy something through them, MaTitie might earn a small commission.
(Appreciate it, brother — money really matters. Thanks in advance! Much love ❤️)

💡 The deeper angle: fees, safety, and discovery (500–600 words)

OnlyFans’ deliberate absence from the App Store isn’t just about stubbornness — it’s a business decision with trade-offs. Apple and Google historically take a 15–30% cut on in-app purchases and subscriptions. For a subscription-first creator economy, that cut eats into creator revenue and complicates payout flows. By staying web-first, OnlyFans avoids that slice and keeps payments, boosts, and tips flowing through its own systems. That was a major part of their calculus when scaling.

That money saved doesn’t just go into founders’ pockets — the company has repeatedly said it plowed lots of revenue into verification, trust & safety, and moderation. Recent reporting and company statements note that OnlyFans employs roughly 1,500 people focused on verification and moderation and requires government IDs for creators, while using facial-scanning tech in markets such as the UK to verify age. The CEO, Keily Blair, has talked about running the platform with no anonymity and no automated recommendation algorithm; those are deliberate choices that change how content spreads and how moderation operates.

That model has consequences:

  • Discovery is less app-store-driven. Fans find creators through social links, DMs, search, and promo pages rather than app-store categories and charts.
  • Onboarding is more frictionful but often safer. Stronger KYC keeps minors out, but it turns sign-up into a process rather than a one-tap install.
  • Monetization can be cleaner. Creators often keep a larger share of direct payments, since there’s no app-store commission siphoning off in-app buys.

These trade-offs are visible in recent news cycles. Creators are still flocking to the platform for flexible income (and celebrities sometimes jump in for a campaign boost), but concerns remain about young people and easy access: outlets have flagged college-campus trends where students turn to OnlyFans for fast cash [Fox News, 2025-09-07]. Meanwhile, other platforms are watching: some commentators suggest mainstream services like Spotify could learn from how OnlyFans treats creators and handles direct monetization and creator-first economics [Know Your Mobile, 2025-09-07].

There’s also a human story: people like Renee Gracie have publicly credited OnlyFans with helping them rebuild confidence and funding comebacks in careers like motorsport [ABC News (AU), 2025-09-06]. That highlights the platform’s real-world economic impact — for some creators it’s career-sustaining.

Still, scale brings scrutiny. OnlyFans reportedly rejects a high percentage of new account applicants (as many as two-thirds in recent months), and regulatory pressure or fines have landed on the company in the past. Web-only doesn’t exempt a platform from oversight or public debate; if anything, it concentrates responsibility on the platform to self-regulate well.

Predicting the near future: expect a hybrid approach. OnlyFans benefits from web payments now, but pressure for easier discovery and frictionless user experience could push the platform to explore more app-friendly integrations that don’t hand over the lion’s share of revenues. Caller ID-style verification, progressive onboarding, and more creator tooling (outsourced editing, analytics, multi-platform distribution) will be priorities. Platforms like Spotify and Patreon will keep watching — and possibly copy — only the parts that work for their business models.

🙋 Frequently Asked Questions

Why doesn’t OnlyFans allow in-app purchases on iOS?

💬 Because the platform routes payments through its web systems to avoid the typical App Store revenue split. That keeps a higher share of revenue for creators and the platform, but it also means installs via app stores aren’t the primary growth funnel.

🛠️ Is it safe to use OnlyFans if it’s not in the App Store?

💬 Yes and no — the platform has invested heavily in verification staff (around 1,500 people) and stricter onboarding, which boosts safety. But web-only access shifts discovery and can increase phishing risks if users aren’t careful. Always verify URLs and use two-factor auth.

🧠 Will other big platforms adopt OnlyFans-style business practices?

💬 Some will borrow ideas — Spotify and others may look at direct payments and creator splits — but regulatory constraints, brand positioning, and app-store rules will shape how far they go. Expect hybrid solutions and more creator-friendly features over the next 12–24 months.

🧩 Final Thoughts…

OnlyFans’ decision to stay off the Apple App Store is a deliberate trade — better economics and heavier safety investment at the cost of app-store discovery and smoother onboarding. For creators, that often means higher net pay and stricter verification; for fans, it means a slightly bumpier access path but potentially safer creator ecosystems. As the creator economy matures, expect experimentation: smarter web onboarding, targeted app integrations, and more cross-platform tools that don’t sacrifice creator revenue.

📚 Further Reading

Here are 3 recent articles that give more context to this topic — all selected from verified sources. Feel free to explore 👇

🔸 “Amber Rose lobt OnlyFans als sichere Stripclub-Alternative”
🗞️ Source: promiflash – 📅 2025-09-07
🔗 Read Article

🔸 “Drea de Matteo releases first fully nude OnlyFans photographs – to highlight ‘geoengineering’”
🗞️ Source: PerthNow – 📅 2025-09-06
🔗 Read Article

🔸 “Winter of the Crow review – Lesley Manville commands cold war thriller”
🗞️ Source: The Guardian – 📅 2025-09-07
🔗 Read Article

😅 A Quick Shameless Plug (Hope You Don’t Mind)

If you’re creating on OnlyFans, Fansly, or similar platforms — don’t let your content go unnoticed.

🔥 Join Top10Fans — the global ranking hub built to spotlight creators like YOU.

✅ Ranked by region & category

✅ Trusted by fans in 100+ countries

🎁 Limited-Time Offer: Get 1 month of FREE homepage promotion when you join now!

🔽 Join Now 🔽

📌 Disclaimer

This post blends publicly available information with a touch of AI assistance. It’s meant for sharing and discussion purposes only — not all details are officially verified. Please take it with a grain of salt and double-check when needed. If anything weird pops up, blame the AI, not me—just ping me and I’ll fix it 😅.